Correction: Transition tag not as great as we thought

Logo -- Free agencyIt turns out that idea about using the transition tag on Sheldon Richardson is not quite as good as we thought it was.

We recently posited the idea that John Schneider might prefer the transition tender to the franchise marker because (1) it is cheaper, (2) Richardson could shop himself, (3) Schneider still could match and (4) Seattle still could get a third-round comp pick in 2019 if Richardson left.

That all still applies, except No. 4. It turns out the NFL recently changed the rule and transition players no longer qualify for comp picks. This was discovered by Nick Korte of Over The Cap in 2016, as related to Miami rescinding the transition tag for Olivier Vernon. (We usually do the right research to get facts straight before posting anything, but we missed this change.)

It takes away some of the leverage we thought Schneider might have if he chose the cheaper tag.

Knowing this rule change, the only way Schneider would consider the cheaper transition tag for Richardson is if he were very confident he would not lose him — i.e., the GM knew Richardson’s market so well that either no team would offer him enough or Schneider would be willing to match any offer.

Of course, if the latter were true, Schneider should be able to strike a deal with Richardson — unless the defensive tackle didn’t want a long-term contract in Seattle.

This all takes us back to the franchise tag, which still seems unlikely unless Schneider plans to use it to trade Richardson. Schneider needs to be judicious in his spending this offseason, and $14.5 million for one player seems unwieldy.

It was always most likely that Schneider would not tag Richardson even if he couldn’t strike a long-term deal, and that seems even more likely at this point.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Correction: Transition tag not as great as we thought”

  1. Hey, even Babe Ruth struck out!

    The more I think about it, the more I think that signing Richardson should be their #1 priority. Seattle’s investment in him is heavy, in terms of the costs to get him and to redevelop him as a 4-3 interior lineman. And, SR is by now a known quantity who happens to be in his prime. He’s durable, too.

    They are thin inside, plus SR is just plain quicker to either side than Reed or Jones. He’s probably moving on, and it will mean losing a difficult-to-replace talent.

    Like

    1. Personally I would rather spread that money out and go after a guy like Justin Pugh or ASJ if they have a soft market. Then go barging bin shopping for a run stuffer like Just Ellis or Daquan Jones.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. While I quit drinking the “in Pete and John we trust” Kool-Aid a while back, in this case I’m inclined to go with their judgment — they have a better track record with defensive players and SR is a known quantity. If they decide to go in another direction, I won’t quarrel.

      Like

      1. He is for sure polarizing, I always hear it pretty split 50/50. Very similar the way people think of trading Earl Thomas, very split.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s